Corrections
Every material change to a published report is recorded here, with the finding affected and the reason. Reports we have withdrawn are listed too — a report taken down is a fact about our research, and hiding it would defeat the purpose of publishing this page.
Corrections to published reports
No corrections have been made to a published report.
Withdrawn reports
Withdrawn on review. Repeated validation raised findings that stated more than their quoted passages supported, across client money, client asset re-use and currency conversion. The underlying evidence is sound but the wording of several findings was not, and a report is withdrawn rather than left published while it fails our own checks.
Withdrawn on review. A CON-03 finding recorded an unauthorised register entry as relating to this firm; the entry matched on a substring of the four-letter trading name and does not name Wise Payments Limited. With that finding removed, evidence completeness falls to 58.9% and the report no longer meets the 60% publication threshold.
Two validation findings on REG-06 and SEC-01 were raised after publication under a stricter review process. Withdrawn pending correction.
If you are the subject of a report and believe a finding is wrong, write to corrections@veracentintelligence.co.uk. We will provide the evidence behind any finding within five working days, correct what we get wrong, and publish a statement of up to 300 words alongside anything we still disagree about.
We would rather hear from a firm directly than from its solicitors.